Skip Navigation



Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on June 10, 2008

Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn171
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
131/3/287    most recent
ncn171v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moquet, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moquet, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

EXPOSURE TO LOW LEVEL GSM 935 MHZ RADIOFREQUENCY FIELDS DOES NOT INDUCE APOPTOSIS IN PROLIFERATING OR DIFFERENTIATED MURINE NEUROBLASTOMA CELLS

J. Moquet*, E. Ainsbury, S. Bouffler and D. Lloyd

Health Protection Agency, Radiation Protection Division, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK

* Corresponding author: jayne.moquet{at}hpa.org.uk

Received March 13, 2008, amended May 1, 2008, accepted May 1, 2008

The aim of this study was to investigate whether radiofrequency (RF) fields characteristic of mobile phones at non-thermal levels can induce apoptosis in murine neuroblastoma (N2a) cells in both proliferating and differentiated states. Cells were exposed continuously for 24 h to one of the three 935-MHz RF signals: global system for mobile communication (GSM) basic, GSM talk and a continuous wave, unmodulated signal; all at a specific energy absorption rate of 2 W kg–1. The measured increase in temperature of the cells due to the RF fields was around 0.06°C. At a number of time points between 0 and 48 h post-exposure, the cells were assessed for apoptosis under a fluorescence microscope using three independent assays: Annexin V, caspase activation and in situ end-labelling. No statistically significant differences in apoptosis levels were observed between the exposed and sham-exposed cells using the three assays at any time point post-exposure. These data suggest that RF exposures, characteristic of GSM mobile phones, do not significantly affect the apoptosis levels in proliferating and differentiated murine neuroblastoma cell line N2a.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.