Skip Navigation



Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on January 29, 2007
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl449
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
122/1-4/528    most recent
ncl449v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redpath, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redpath, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Micros 2005 Special Issue

HEALTH RISKS OF LOW PHOTON ENERGY IMAGING

J. L. Redpath 1 *

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. L. Redpath, E-mail: jlredpat{at}uci.edu


  Abstract

The major health risk associated with low photon energy imaging is thought to be the induction of cancer as a consequence of the radiation exposure and this is the focus of this paper. Low photon energy imaging typically involves exposure to a low dose (<50 mGy) of low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation delivered at high dose-rate. Since epidemiologic data cannot provide an accurate assessment of risk at the doses used in imaging, risk estimates are currently made by fitting a linear response to intermediate and high dose data for cancer induction in radiation-exposed human populations. This method assumes a linear no-threshold (LNT) response and implies that no dose of radiation is safe. This assumption is not borne out by many laboratory studies of cancer-related endpoints that would suggest that the risk at low doses is much less than would be estimated from linear extrapolation from intermediate to high doses. It is also well recognised that the dose-response from many epidemiologic studies could equally well be fit by threshold models.Through the study of radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro J-shaped dose-response curves for a variety of low LET radiations, including those used in low photon energy imaging, have been demonstrated. The relative risks calculated from this data compare remarkably well with those for breast cancer and leukemia incidence in radiation-exposed populations. From this it is concluded that the LNT hypothesis is likely to overestimate the risk of cancer induction by low photon energy imaging, at least for certain tumors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.