Skip Navigation



Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on March 31, 2006

Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/2/182    most recent
ncl029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beck, P.
Right arrow Articles by Spurny, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beck, P.
Right arrow Articles by Spurny, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PAPER

AIRCRAFT CREW RADIATION WORKPLACES: COMPARISON OF MEASURED AND CALCULATED AMBIENT DOSE EQUIVALENT RATE DATA USING THE EURADOS IN-FLIGHT RADIATION DATA BASE

Peter Beck 1 *, David Bartlett 2, Lennart Lindborg 3, Ian McAulay 4, Klaus Schnuer 5, Hans Schraube 6, and Frantisek Spurny 7

1 ARC Seibersdorf Research (ARCS), Seibersdorf, Austria
2 National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB), Chilton Didcot, UK
3 Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI), S-171 16 Stockholm, Sweden
4 Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
5 European Communities (EC), Luxembourg
6 Forschungszentrum fuer Umwelt und Gesundheit (GSF), Institut fuer Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, Germany
7 Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Peter Beck, E-mail: peter.beck{at}acs.ac.at


   Abstract

In May 2000, the chairman of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) invited a number of experts with experience of cosmic radiation dosimetry to form a working group (WG 5) on aircraft crew dosimetry. Three observers from the Article 31 Group of Experts as well as one observer from the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) were also appointed. The European Commission funded the meetings. Full meetings were organised in January 2001 and in November 2001. An editorial group, who are the authors of this publication, started late in 2002 to finalise a draft report, which was submitted to the Article 31 Group of Experts in June 2003. The methods and data reported are the product of the work of 26 research institutes from the EU, USA and Canada. Some of the work was supported by contracts with the European Commission, Directorate General XII, Science, Research and Development. A first overview of the EC report was published late in 2004. In this publication we focus on a comparison of measured and calculated ambient dose rate data using the EURADOS In-Flight Data Base. The evaluation of results obtained by different methods and groups, and comparison of measurement results and the results of calculations were performed in terms of the operational quantity ambient dose equivalent, H*(10). Aspects of measurement uncertainty are reported also. The paper discusses the estimation of annual doses for given flight hours and gives an outline of further research needed in the field of aircraft crew dosimetry, such as the influence of solar particle events.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
P. A. Colgan, H. Synnott, and D. Fenton
Individual and collective doses from cosmic radiation in Ireland
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2007; 123(4): 426 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.