Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on February 3, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/nci747
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PAPER
1 Medical Physics Department, ‘S. Maria della Misericordia’ Hospital, Piazzale S. Maria della Misericordia, 11, 33100 Udine, Italy; Specialisation School in Medical Physics, Physics Department--Milano University, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dynamic digital flat-panel (FD) imaging technology is characterised by a higher sensitivity and image quality compared to image intensifier (II) technology. In this study, an angiography system based on II and one based on FD were compared with respect to system performance and impact of patient dose in interventional cardiology. When entrance surface air kerma rates are measured, the FD system requires a reduced dose rate, of up to 40%. For coronary angiography (CA), fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose-area product (DAP) were 4.3 ± 5.0 min and 31.2 ± 30.2 Gy cm2 on the II system and 4.4 ± 3.8 min and 33.4 ± 19.2 Gy cm2 with the FD system. For percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography, FT and DAP were 11.4 ± 10.7 min and 52.1 ± 45.0 Gy cm2 on II and 10.7 ± 8.7 min and 66.9 ± 54.4 Gy cm2 on DF. Data comparison suggests that reduced entrance dose rates do not automatically imply a reduction of patient dose in clinical practice.
ARE NEW TECHNOLOGIES ALWAYS REDUCING PATIENT DOSES IN CARDIAC PROCEDURES?
A. Trianni 1 *,
G. Bernardi 2,
and
R. Padovani 3
2 Cardiology Department, ‘S. Maria della Misericordia’ Hospital, Piazzale S. Maria della Misericordia, 11, 33100 Udine, Italy
3 Medical Physics Department, ‘S. Maria della Misericordia’ Hospital, Piazzale S. Maria della Misericordia, 11, 33100 Udine, Italy
A. Trianni, E-mail: trianni.annalisa{at}aoud.sanita.fvg.it
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V TSAPAKI, P N MANIATIS, A MAGGINAS, V VOUDRIS, S PATSILINAKOS, T VRANZTA, E VANO, and D S COKKINOS What are the clinical and technical factors that influence the kerma-area product in percutaneous coronary intervention? Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2008; 81(972): 940 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Mavrikou, S. Kottou, V. Tsapaki, and V. Neofotistou HIGH PATIENT DOSES IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY DUE TO PHYSICIANS' NEGLIGENCE: HOW CAN THEY BE PREVENTED? Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 12, 2008; (2008) ncn005v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Korner, C. H. Weber, S. Wirth, K.-J. Pfeifer, M. F. Reiser, and M. Treitl Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and System Overview RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 675 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


