Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedogni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Monteventi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bedogni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Monteventi, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 96:187-190 (2001)
© 2001 Oxford University Press

ENEA Personal Dosemeters for Assessing Hp(10) and Hp(0.07)

R. Bedogni, E. Fantuzzi and F. Monteventi

Although, at present, neither Italian legislation nor technical protocols require that personal dosimetry is performed to assess Hp(d), the ENEA Individual Monitoring Service (IMS) is able to supply thermoluminescence (TL) whole-body and extremity dosemeters for photon and beta fields, based on LiF(Mg,Cu,P) detectors and these have been fully developed at the ENEA Institute for Radiation Protection (IRP). All irradiation tests have been performed with ISO phantoms and ISO recommended reference radiations at the ENEA-IRP Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory. The whole-body dosemeter contains two LiF(Mg,Cu,P) (GR200) detectors that are filtered differently. One is filtered on both sides by 290 mg.cm-2 mass per area (270 mg.cm-2 Al + 20 mg.cm-2 plastic protective layer); the other is filtered on both sides by a plastic layer of 20 mg.cm-2 mass per area. In photon radiation fields, the maximum uncertainty due to the energy dependence of the response, is ±4% for Hp(0.07) in the energy range 13 keV to 202 keV, and ±15% for Hp(10) in the range 13 keV to 1.25 MeV. The dosemeter response in terms of Hp(d,a) in beta fields has been investigated recently. The results of a EURADOS trial performance test for photon and beta fields are reported and discussed in this paper. The extremity dosemeter currently used at ENEA IMS consists of a GR200 detector glued on a kapton strip identified by a bar code. Its response in terms of Hp(0.07,a) has been measured recently and the results are given. Moreover, different dosemeter assemblies have been tested to compare the performances in photon and beta fields. Therefore, the following three constructions have been prepared: (1) an MCP-Ns (8.5 mg.cm-2 mass per area) detector with a Mylar filter of 0.5 mg.cm-2 mass per area; (2) a polyethylene filter of 12 mg.cm-2 mass per area; and (3) a GR200 (210 mg.cm-2 mass per area) detector with a Mylar filter of 0.5 mg.cm-2. Finally, a brief discussion on international and Italian requirements for personal monitoring is given.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
E. Fantuzzi, F. Mariotti, B. Morelli, and G. Uleri
The implementation in routine of the ENEA new personal photon dosemeter
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2006; 120(1-4): 278 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
F. Mariotti, G. Uleri, and E. Fantuzzi
Batch homogeneity of LiF(Mg,Cu,P)-GR200 and LiF(Mg,Cu,P)-MCP-NS TL detectors for use as extremity dosemeters at ENEA personal dosimetry service
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2006; 120(1-4): 283 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.