Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, A.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by James, A.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 7:353-366 (1984)
© 1984 Oxford University Press

Dosimetric Approaches to Risk Assessment for Indoor Exposure to Radon Daughters

A.C. James (INVITED)

The ICRP has weighted its judgement of the excess risk of lung cancer from occupational exposure to radon daughters towards the evaluation of an effective dose equivalent per unit intake and thus exposure. The OECD/NEA and UNSCEAR have applied this approach to evaluate absorbed doses from exposure of the general public, taking into account the different conditions of exposure. They concluded that the effective dose equivalent (and hence lifetime risk) per unit exposure in domestic environments is about half that in mines, corresponding to a conversion coefficient of 5 mSv per WLM. An alternative concept of dosimetric assessment is being considered by the NCRP (USA), where the risk per unit exposure for the general public is derived from the ratio of doses absorbed by bronchial cells under mine and domestic exposure conditions and a reference risk coefficient extrapolated from the range of lung cancer rates reported for uranium miners. This approach leads to a numerically higher estimate of the conversion coefficient of 12 mSv per WLM. These two different approaches to dosimetric analysis are reviewed and the sensitivity of risk estimates to the underlying assumptions and uncertainties of dosimetric models and other critical parameters is examined. It is concluded that whichever dosimetric approach is used, exposure to potential alpha energy is an adequate index of the excess lifetime risk of lung cancer over the range of environmental conditions associated with high exposures in the home.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
N. M. Rahman, T. Iida, H. Yamazawa, S. Yokoyama, J. Moriizumi, F. Saito, and T. Ito
THE STUDY OF ACTIVITY MEDIAN AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER USING IMAGING PLATE TECHNIQUE FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVE DOSE FROM RADON AND ITS DECAY PRODUCTS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 26, 2007; (2007) ncm221v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
I. Balashazy, W. Hofmann, and T. Heistracher
Local particle deposition patterns may play a key role in the development of lung cancer
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2003; 94(5): 1719 - 1725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.