Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2009 135(2):69-70; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncp111
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malone, J.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malone, J.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

SENTINEL Project special initiative: ethical and justification issues in medical radiation protection

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The EC SENTINEL Project was undertaken with a view to looking at the ‘Safety and Efficacy for New Techniques and Imaging using New Equipment to support European Legislation’. Many aspects of conventional and digital radiology, including fluoroscopy, new detectors and interventional procedures in both radiology and cardiology were examined during the project. However, in trying to cope with radiation safety issues over such a wide range, differences in approach became evident. These lead to a questioning of the soundness of some of the approaches commonly accepted within the radiation protection community.

This consequent unease propagated and led to the view that it would . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Jim Malone, Una O'Connor and Keith Faulkner


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?