Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 131(3):374-378; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn183
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Experimental evaluation of PCXMC and prepare codes used in conventional radiology
1 Département de Physique Médicale, Centre de Recherche Nucléaire d'Alger 2, Boulevard Frantz Fanon, B.P. 399, Alger-Gare, Algeria
2 Department of Medical Physics, Konstantopoulio Hospital, Athens, Greece
3 Université des Sciences et Technologie Houari Boumediene, Alger, Algeria
* Corresponding author: nadiakhelassi{at}comena-dz.org
Received April 1, 2008, amended June 1, 2008, accepted June 10, 2008
The objective of this study is to evaluate the precision of dose-calculation computer codes used in our laboratory (PCXMC and PREPARE) for organ dose evaluation. Measurements of entrance and organ dose were performed using ionisation chamber and thermoluminescence dosimetry. To obtain a mean dose of organ, we have used the Rando–Alderson phantom. The results showed that computed and measured doses correlate well (within 28%) in 60% of the samples. The percentage shows that the computed doses correlate with the experimental doses rather well for PCXMC software than PREPARE. Although the two programs are based on the Monte-Carlo method, their calculations differ. PCXMC carries out a simulation of the trajectory of the photon, whereas PREPARE provides interpolated values. Our experimental results are close to the values given by the PCXMC, a program which takes into account the weight, the height of the patient and field dimensions.