Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on April 3, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 129(1-3):311-315; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn085
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/1-3/311    most recent
ncn085v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Zoetelief, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Zoetelief, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Dosemeter readings and effective dose to the cardiologist with protective clothing in a simulated interventional procedure

F. W. Schultz* and J. Zoetelief

Delft University of Technology, Applied Sciences, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author: f.w.schultz{at}tudelft.nl

A personal dosemeter issued for individual monitoring is calibrated in terms of personal dose equivalent, usually HP(10). In general it yields a reasonable estimate of effective dose (E) when the exposed person does not wear protective clothing. In interventional cardiology, however, a lead equivalent apron is worn and often a thyroid collar. A correction factor will then be necessary to convert a dosemeter reading to E. To explore this factor an interventional cardiology procedure is simulated based on exposure conditions typical for a modern hospital in the BENELUX area. The dose to the cardiologist is investigated using Monte Carlo simulation of radiation transport. It is concluded that a personal dosemeter may best be worn outside the apron at a central position high on the chest for least dependence on the beam direction. It will overestimate E by roughly a factor of 20 (apron and thyroid collar of 0.25 mm Pb).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Zuguchi, K. Chida, M. Taura, Y. Inaba, A. Ebata, and S. Yamada
USEFULNESS OF NON-LEAD APRONS IN RADIATION PROTECTION FOR PHYSICIANS PERFORMING INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 17, 2008; (2008) ncn244v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.