Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on April 17, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 129(1-3):307-310; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn087
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/1-3/307    most recent
ncn087v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Reilly, G.
Right arrow Articles by Malone, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Reilly, G.
Right arrow Articles by Malone, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ethical issues in medico-legal exposures

Geraldine O'Reilly* and J. F. Malone

Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland, UK

* Corresponding author: goreilly{at}stjames.ie

The Medical Exposure Directive (MED) 97/43/Euratom defines medico-legal procedures as ‘procedures performed for insurance or legal purposes without a medical indication’. The term ‘medico-legal exposures’ covers a wide range of possible types of exposures, very different in nature, for which the only feature in common is the fact that the main reason for performing them does not relate directly to the health of the individual being exposed to ionising radiation. The key issue in medico-legal exposures is justification. Balancing the advantages and disadvantages of such exposures is complex because not only can these be difficult to quantify and hence compare, but often the advantage may be to society whereas the disadvantage is usually to an individual. This adds an additional layer of ethical complexity to the problem and one, which requires input from a number of sources beyond the established radiation protection community. Because medico-legal exposures are considered to be medical exposures, they are not subject to dose limits. In medico-legal exposures where the benefit is not necessarily to the individual undergoing the exposure, the question must be asked as to whether or not this is an appropriate framework within which to conduct such exposures. This paper looks at the current situation in Europe, highlighting some of the particular problems that have arisen, and tries to identify the areas, which require further clarification and guidance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. F. Malone
Radiation protection in medicine: ethical framework revisited
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2009; 135(2): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. F. Malone
New ethical issues for radiation protection in diagnostic radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 6 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.