Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on April 1, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 129(1-3):279-283; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn086
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/1-3/279    most recent
ncn086v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Malone, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Malone, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

QA/acceptance testing of DEXA X-ray systems used in bone mineral densitometry

A. Larkin1,*, N. Sheahan1, U. O'Connor1, L. Gray1, A. Dowling1, E. Vano2, P. Torbica3, D. Salat4, A. Schreiner5, V. Neofotistou6 and J. F. Malone1

1 St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, UK
2 Medicine School Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
3 Department of Radiology, Innsbruck University Hospital, Austria
4 Medicontrol, Stanicna 24, 91105 Trencin, Slovika
5 Division de la Radioprotection, Villa Louvigny, L-2120 Alle Marconi, Luxembourg
6 Regional Athens General Hospital "G. Gennimatas", Athens, Greece

* Corresponding author: amlarkin1{at}eircom.net

New developments in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) imaging technology [fan beam and cone beam (CB)] result in higher exposure levels, shorter scan times, increased patient throughput and increased shielding requirements. This study presents the results of a European survey detailing the number and location of DEXA systems in SENTINEL partner states and the QA (quality assurance) currently performed by physicists and operators in these centres. The results of a DEXA equipment survey based on an in-house developed QA protocol are presented. Measurements show that the total effective dose to the patient from a spine and dual femur DEXA examination on the latest generation DEXA systems is comparable with a few µSv at most. Scatter measurements showed that the use of a mobile lead screen for staff protection was necessary for fan and CB systems. Scattered dose from newer generation systems may also exceed the exposure limits for the general public so structural shielding may also be required. Considerable variation in the magnitude and annual repeatability of half value layer was noted between different models of DEXA scanners. A comparative study of BMD (bone mineral density) accuracy using the European Spine Phantom highlighted a deviation of up to 7% in BMD values between scanners of different manufacturers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.