Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on June 26, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 129(1-3):222-226; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn154
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/1-3/222    most recent
ncn154v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loubele, M.
Right arrow Articles by Suetens, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loubele, M.
Right arrow Articles by Suetens, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications

M. Loubele1,2,3,*, F. Maes1, R. Jacobs3,4, D. van Steenberghe2,3, S. C. White5 and P. Suetens1

1 ESAT-PSI, KULeuven, Medical Imaging Center, Herestraat 49 bus 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
2 Brånemark Chair for Osseointegration, KULeuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
3 Department of Periodontology, KULeuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
4 Oral Imaging Center, KULeuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
5 School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, USA

* Corresponding author: miet.loubele{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be

The image quality of four cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanners dedicated for dentomaxillofacial imaging and one multi-slice computed tomgoraphy (MSCT) scanner was compared. For the MSCT scanner, a clinical and a low-dose protocol for oral indications were evaluated. The image quality was assessed by dedicated software that allows an automated analysis of accuracy measurements and evaluation of metal artefacts on two image quality phantoms. Bone was segmented with sub-millimetre accuracyin all scanners.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Z. Rumboldt, W. Huda, and J.W. All
Review of Portable CT with Assessment of a Dedicated Head CT Scanner
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2009; 30(9): 1630 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.