Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on October 15, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007 125(1-4):412-415; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl123
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
125/1-4/412    most recent
ncl123v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latocha, M.
Right arrow Articles by Trompier, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Latocha, M.
Right arrow Articles by Trompier, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The results of cosmic radiation in-flight TEPC measurements during the CAATER flight campaign and comparison with simulation

M. Latocha1,2, M. Autischer1, P. Beck1,*, J. F. Bottolier–Depois3, S. Rollet1 and F. Trompier3

1 ARC Seibersdorf research GmbH 2444 Seibersdorf, Austria
2 Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences 31-342 Kraków, Poland
3 Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France

*Corresponding author: peter.beck{at}arcs.ac.at

The European-Commission-supported project DOSMAX (Dosimetry of Aircrew Exposure to Radiation During Solar Maximum) was aimed at measuring aircrew exposure to cosmic radiation on-board the aircraft during solar maximum. During a dedicated international comparison mission (Co-ordinated Access to Aircraft for Transnational Environmental Research; CAATER) different measurement techniques have been compared by six European institutes (Results of the CAATER Mission, DOSMAX Meeting, Dublin, June 2004). In this paper, we present the tissue-equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) measurements carried out by ARC Seibersdorf research (ARCS), Austria, and Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), France, together with a comparison with simulation results under the same conditions. The whole flight campaign consists of four different in-flight investigations performed at two different geographical positions at 12.2 km (FL 400) and 9.8 km (FL 320). One location was chosen above Rome (42° North, 12° East), Italy, for high cut-off rigidity (6.4 GV) and the second above Aalborg (57° North, 10° East), Denmark, for low cut-off rigidity (1.8 GV). The TEPC measurements are presented in terms of absorbed dose and ambient dose equivalent as well as microdosimetric spectra as a function of lineal energy. For the same conditions of the CAATER flights the response of the TEPC has also been simulated by using the Monte Carlo Transport Code FLUKA (version 2003). The results from simulations are compared with measurements and they show a reasonable agreement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
P. Beck
Overview of research on aircraft crew dosimetry during the last solar cycle
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, October 1, 2009; 136(4): 244 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
P. Beck, C. Dyer, N. Fuller, A. Hands, M. Latocha, S. Rollet, and F. Spurny
Overview of on-board measurements during solar storm periods
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, October 1, 2009; 136(4): 297 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.