Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on May 24, 2007
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007 124(2):89-96; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm176
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
124/2/89    most recent
ncm176v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren-Forward, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wessel, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren-Forward, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wessel, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation

Helen Warren-Forward1,*, Paul Cardew1,2, Bradley Smith1, Llewellyn Clack1, Kym McWhirter1, Stacey Johnson1 and Kimberly Wessel1

1 Medical Radiation Science, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

* Corresponding author: helen.warren-forward{at}newcastle.edu.au

Nuclear medicine technologists (NMTs) have the highest effective doses of radiation among medical workers. With increase in the use of lightweight materials in diagnostic radiography, the aim was to compare the effectiveness of lead and lightweight aprons in shielding from 99m-Technetium (99mTc) gamma rays. The doses received from a scattering phantom to the entrance, 9cm depth and exit of a phantom were measured with LiF:Mg, Cu, P thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). Doses and spectra were assessed without no shielding, with 0.5-mm lead and lightweight aprons. The lead and lightweight aprons decreased entrance surface doses by 76 and 59%, respectively. The spectral analysis showed that the lightweight apron provided better dose reduction at energies <95 keV, though lead was 35% more efficient at higher energies. While lead apron demonstrated better shielding, the additional savings should be considered with the weight differential. It is concluded that the lightweight apron is suitable to be worn by NMTs interacting with patients injected with a 99mTc labelled radiopharmaceutical.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.