Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on December 6, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006 122(1-4):362-366; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl438
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
122/1-4/362    most recent
ncl438v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trovati, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zankl, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trovati, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zankl, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Human exposure to space radiation: role of primary and secondary particles

S. Trovati1,2,*, F. Ballarini1,2, G. Battistoni3,4, F. Cerutti3,4, A. Fassò5, A. Ferrari4,6, E. Gadioli3,4, M. V. Garzelli3,4, A. Mairani1,2, A. Ottolenghi1,2, H. G. Paretzke7, V. Parini3, M. Pelliccioni8, L. Pinsky9, P. R. Sala4,6, D. Scannicchio1,2 and M. Zankl7

1 Department of Nuclear and Theoretical Physics, University of Pavia, via Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2 National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Pavia, via Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, Italy
3 Department of Physics, University of Milan, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy
4 National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Milano, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy
5 SLAC Stanford, USA
6 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
7 GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
8 National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), LNF, Frascati (Roma), Italy
9 Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA

* Corresponding author: Stefania.Trovati{at}pv.infn.it


   Abstract

Human exposure to space radiation implies two kinds of risk, both stochastic and deterministic. Shielding optimisation therefore represents a crucial goal for long-term missions, especially in deep space. In this context, the use of radiation transport codes coupled with anthropomorphic phantoms allows to simulate typical radiation exposures for astronauts behind different shielding, and to calculate doses to different organs. In this work, the FLUKA Monte Carlo code and two phantoms, a mathematical model and a voxel model, were used, taking the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) spectra from the model of Badhwar and O'Neill. The time integral spectral proton fluence of the August 1972 Solar Particle Event (SPE) was represented by an exponential function. For each aluminium shield thickness, besides total doses the contributions from primary and secondary particles for different organs and tissues were calculated separately. More specifically, organ-averaged absorbed doses, dose equivalents and a form of ‘biological dose’, defined on the basis of initial (clustered) DNA damage, were calculated. As expected, the SPE doses dramatically decreased with increasing shielding, and doses in internal organs were lower than in skin. The contribution of secondary particles to SPE doses was almost negligible; however it is of note that, at high shielding (10 g cm–2), most of the secondaries are neutrons. GCR organ doses remained roughly constant with increasing Al shielding. In contrast to SPE results, for the case of cosmic rays, secondary particles accounted for a significant fraction of the total dose.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.