Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on April 5, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006 121(3):211-220; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl031
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparative performance tests of the FLUKA-RQMD system and EPAX 2 previsions vs. experimental data
1 Dipartimento di Ingegneria Nucleare, Politecnico di Milano, via Ponzio 34/3, I-20133 Milano, Italy
2 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy
* Corresponding author: alessandro.porta{at}polimi.it
Received December 22, 2005, amended February 6, 2006, accepted February 19, 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
This work describes the tests performed on the RQMD module (available in the FLUKA code), to support nucleusnucleus interactions above 100 MeV u1. The RQMD-FLUKA system was used to simulate directly simple experimental set-ups to reproduce both secondary hadron production and residual nuclei distributions with ion beams ranging from 100 to 800 MeV u1. Recent measurements of residual nuclei distributions due to interaction of light ion beams on high-purity targets were used as reference for testing the RQMD-FLUKA prediction capability. Together with FLUKA, the EPAX 2 code was considered as a further reference in fragmentation cross sections. EPAX shows a general tendency to underestimate the experimental fragmentation cross sections for the considered projectiletarget combinations. EPAX underestimations are generally close to 40%, whereas FLUKA predictions are within 20% on the average.