Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on February 3, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 117(1-3):87-92; doi:10.1093/rpd/nci733
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/1-3/87    most recent
nci733v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Struelens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Geukens, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Struelens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Geukens, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses

L. Struelens1,*, F. Vanhavere1, H. Bosmans2, R. Van Loon3 and M. Geukens4

1 SCK • CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
2 UZ-GHB, Radiology Department, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
3 Free University of Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
4 Siemens, Charleroisesteenweg 116, 1060 Brussel, Belgium

* Corresponding author: lara.struelens{at}sckcen.be

In this study, patient doses were analysed against exposure parameters and procedure protocol. Patient doses were measured in seven hospitals for a standard diagnostic vascular examination. Image quality was assessed using the contrast-detail phantom from Nijmegen (CD-DISC 2.0). A link between dose and image quality was investigated. Image quality strongly depends on the preset dose level. The higher the dose level, the better the image quality, but also the higher the patient dose. However, no clear correlation was found between total dose–area product (DAP) or effective dose and image quality. A large range in patient dose was found: DAP (22–130 Gy cm2) and effective dose (3.9–16.8 mSv). A difference in number of frames was also found in the different centres, owing to different frame rates (3-2-1 frames per second) and use of oblique projections. Differences in doses and exposure settings offer the possibility of optimising patient doses in angiography and interventional radiology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. Padovani, E. Vano, A. Trianni, C. Bokou, H. Bosmans, D. Bor, J. Jankowski, P. Torbica, K. Kepler, A. Dowling, et al.
Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 104 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.