Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 116(1-4):461-465; doi:10.1093/rpd/nci203
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyatt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wyatt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of treatment planning dose calculations with measurements and Monte Carlo calculations in a RANDO phantom

M. Wyatt, C. Corredor, M. Tamimi and L. F. Miller*

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996, Tennessee, USA

* Corresponding author: lfmiller{at}utk.edu

Solid tumours are often treated with external beams of photons generated by Bremsstrahlung radiation. These beams are shaped and filtered to optimise the dose to specific regions defined by the treatment plans, which may involve irradiations from multiple angles. It is important that doses to healthy tissue do not exceed tolerance doses and that the dose to the tumour is maximised. To accomplish these objectives, commercially available 3-D treatment planning software is used to calculate doses to healthy tissue and to the tumour. It is generally believed that these commercial software packages calculate doses through the patient to within a few per cent. In order to examine this claim, dose calculations obtained from ADAC software for external beam treatment to the pelvic region of a RANDO phantom are compared with 37 thermoluminescence dosemeters placed into several slices of a RANDO phantom. The phantom was irradiated to obtain a prescription dose of 180 cGy at the tumour location. Data from homogeneous regions agree within several per cent with results obtained from ADAC software, whereas this comparison is less favourable in regions of heterogeneity. Results from Monte Carlo calculations in a homogeneous phantom are comparable to results from ADAC treatment planning software.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.