Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 115(1-4):334-336; doi:10.1093/rpd/nci166
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konnai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Odano, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konnai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Odano, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10–150 keV monoenergetic photons

A. Konnai1,*, N. Nariyama2, S. Ohnishi1 and N. Odano1

1 National Maritime Research Institute, Shinkawa 6-38-1, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0004, Japan
2 Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Kouto 1-1-1, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan

* Corresponding author: konnai{at}nmri.go.jp

Energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P and Mg2SiO4:Tb thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs) was measured in the range 10–150 keV for monoenergetic photons at SPring-8 of an 8-GeV synchrotron radiation facility. The photon beam was monitored by a parallel-plate free-air ionisation chamber calibrated with an uncertainty of 3%. Owing to the small dimension of the beam, a rotating holder was designed in order to irradiate TLDs uniformly. The measured responses of LiF to energy were approximately in agreement with the calculated dose absorption dependence in the soft tissue. However, two types of LiF TLDs presented the different luminescent responses to the photon energy. The response of LiF:Mg,Ti had a smooth curve, and that of LiF:Mg,Cu,P presented a local maximum at 30 keV and a local minimum at 100 keV. The Mg2SiO4:Tb response was nearly bone equivalent. Linearity of dose responses was also confirmed up to 2 Gy on each TL material.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.