Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 114(1-3):69-74; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch518
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tischenko, O.
Right arrow Articles by Buhr, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tischenko, O.
Right arrow Articles by Buhr, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Reduction of anatomical noise in medical X-ray images

Oleg Tischenko1,*, Christoph Hoeschen1 and Egbert Buhr2

1 Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. Formally: otto-von-Guericke-University, Department for Diagnostic Radiology, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
2 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany

* Corresponding author: Oleg.Tischenko{at}gsf.de

The X-ray pattern of a mass of very fine non-distinguishable anatomical structures alters completely from radiograph to radiograph due to the unavoidable movements of the patient during the exposure. The corresponding image component shows noise-like behaviour and is therefore referred to as the anatomical noise. Reducing this component would enhance the quality of the clinical X-ray image and increase the detectability of radiological signal. We have found that by comparing two X-ray images of the same anatomy acquired under slightly different imaging geometry, it is possible to reduce the anatomical noise in one of the image pair. The proposed method, which allows this, is based on the appropriate attenuation in the wavelet domain. The values of attenuating factors for the wavelet coefficients are proportional to the correlation between the corresponding features of both images. This method was tested for different changes in the imaging geometry. In the case of no geometrical changes, only the quantum and the electronic noise are reduced. An effect of de-noising for the investigated images is obvious.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
D. F. Regulla and H. Eder
Patient exposure in medical X-ray imaging in Europe
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 11 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
O. Tischenko, C. Hoeschen, D. R. Dance, R. A. Hunt, A. D. A. Maidment, and P. R. Bakic
Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 81 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, A. Tingberg, S. Mattsson, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 85 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, C. Hoeschen, O. Tischenko, S. Kheddache, J. Vikgren, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.