Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 114(1-3):45-52; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch550
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Börjesson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Månsson, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Börjesson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Månsson, L. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology

Sara Börjesson1, Markus Håkansson1,*, Magnus Båth1, Susanne Kheddache2, Sune Svensson1, Anders Tingberg3, Anna Grahn3, Mark Ruschin3, Bengt Hemdal3, Sören Mattsson3 and Lars Gunnar Månsson1

1 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
2 Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
3 Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden

* Corresponding author: markus.hakansson{at}vgregion.se

Observer performance studies are time-consuming tasks, both for the participating observers and for the scientists collecting and analysing the data. A possible way to optimise such studies is to perform them in a completely digital environment. A software tool—ViewDEX (Viewer for Digital Evaluation of X-ray images)—has been developed in Java, enabling it to function on almost any computer. ViewDEX is designed to handle several types of studies, such as visual grading analysis (VGA), image criteria scoring (ICS) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The results from each observer are saved in a log file, which can be exported for further analysis in, for example, a special software for analysing ROC results. By using ViewDEX for an ROC experiment, an evaluation rate of ~200 images per hour can be achieved, compared to ~25 images per hour using hard copy evaluation. The results are obtained within minutes of completion of the viewing. The risk of human errors in the process of data collection and analysis is also minimised. The viewer has been used in a major trial containing ~2700 images.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K LEDENIUS, M GUSTAVSSON, S JOHANSSON, F STALHAMMAR, L-M WIKLUND, and A Thilander-KLANG
Effect of tube current on diagnostic image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2009; 82(976): 313 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T Svahn, B Hemdal, M Ruschin, D P Chakraborty, I Andersson, A Tingberg, and S Mattsson
Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantom
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 557 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, A. Tingberg, S. Mattsson, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 85 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Flinck, G. Ullman, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 92 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. A. Johnsson, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, F. O. Bochud, F. R. Verdun, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, C. Hoeschen, O. Tischenko, S. Kheddache, J. Vikgren, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
B. Hemdal, I. Andersson, A. Grahn, M. Hakansson, M. Ruschin, A. Thilander-Klang, M. Bath, S. Borjesson, J. Medin, A. Tingberg, et al.
Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? a pilot study using revised image quality criteria
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 383 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.