Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 114(1-3):321-325; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch521
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castellano, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castellano, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

CT dosimetry: getting the best from the adult Cristy phantom

I. A. Castellano1,*, D. R. Dance1 and P. M. Evans2

1 Physics Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
2 Physics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK

* Corresponding author: elly.castellano{at}rmh.nhs.uk

The use of geometrical phantoms for computed tomography (CT) dosimetry can incur errors in the calculation of effective dose due to the anatomically incorrect organ shapes and distributions, and unrepresentative body dimensions. A Monte Carlo program that makes use of an anatomically correct voxel phantom has been developed to calculate effective doses in CT and to compare with conventional dosimetric techniques. The code was validated against the latter by matching the phantom dimensions and simulating whole-body irradiation; agreement to within 6% was found. Effective doses were calculated for brain, lung, abdomen and pelvis CT scans for voxel phantom sizes corresponding to those of standard-sized adult, a teenager and 10% greater than those of standard-sized adult. Errors incurred by using the conventional techniques are minimised if the scan range is set by matching the fractions of radiosensitive organs that are irradiated directly. Under these circumstances, the conventional techniques will underestimate the dose to a 15 y old by up to 22% while the dose to a large subject is overestimated by up to 11%.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. Sechopoulos, S. Vedantham, S. Suryanarayanan, C. J. D'Orsi, and A. Karellas
Monte Carlo and Phantom Study of the Radiation Dose to the Body from Dedicated CT of the Breast
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 98 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. Sechopoulos, S. Suryanarayanan, S. Vedantham, C. J. D'Orsi, and A. Karellas
Radiation Dose to Organs and Tissues from Mammography: Monte Carlo and Phantom Study
Radiology, December 4, 2007; (2007) 2462070256.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.