Invited Paper
A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging
1 Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
2 Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
3 Department of Physics, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
4 Multi-Modality Imaging Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
* Corresponding author: samei{at}deckard.duhs.duke.edu
The transition to digital radiology has provided new opportunities for improved image quality, made possible by the superior detective quantum efficiency and post-processing capabilities of new imaging systems, and advanced imaging applications, made possible by rapid digital image acquisition. However, this transition has taken place largely without optimising the radiographic technique used to acquire the images. This paper proposes a framework for optimising the acquisition of digital X-ray images. The proposed approach is based on the signal and noise characteristics of the digital images and the applied exposure. Signal is defined, based on the clinical task involved in an imaging application, as the difference between the detector signal with and without a target present against a representative background. Noise is determined from the noise properties of uniformly acquired images of the background, taking into consideration the absorption properties of the detector. Incident exposure is estimated or otherwise measured free in air, and converted to dose. The main figure of merit (FOM) for optimisation is defined as the signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SdNR) squared per unit exposure or (more preferably) dose. This paper highlights three specific technique optimisation studies that used this approach to optimise the radiographic technique for digital chest and breast applications. In the first study, which was focused on chest radiography with a CsI flat-panel detector, a range of kVp (50–150) and filtration (Z = 13–82) were examined in terms of their associated FOM as well as soft tissue to bone contrast, a factor of importance in digital chest radiography. The results indicated that additive Cu filtration can improve image quality. A second study in digital mammography using a selenium direct flat-panel detector indicated improved SdNR per unit exposure with the use of a tungsten target and a rhodium filter than conventional molybdenum target/molybdenum filter techniques. Finally, a third study focusing on cone-beam computed tomography of the breast using a CsI flat-panel detector indicated that high Z filtration of a tungsten target X-ray beam can notably improve the signal and noise characteristics of the image. The general findings highlight the fact that the techniques that are conventionally assumed to be optimum may need to be revisited for digital radiography.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C S MOORE, J R SAUNDERSON, and A W BEAVIS Investigating the exposure class of a computed radiography system for optimisation of physical image quality for chest radiography Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2009; 82(981): 705 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Marin, R. C. Nelson, E. Samei, E. K. Paulson, L. M. Ho, D. T. Boll, D. M. DeLong, T. T. Yoshizumi, and S. T. Schindera Hypervascular Liver Tumors: Low Tube Voltage, High Tube Current Multidetector CT during Late Hepatic Arterial Phase for Detection--Initial Clinical Experience Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 771 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C S MOORE, A W BEAVIS, and J R SAUNDERSON Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2008; 81(970): 771 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Kepler and A. Vladimirov Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 127 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. E. Muhogora, A. Devetti, R. Padovani, P. Msaki, and F. Bonutti Application of European protocol in the evaluation of contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose for two digital mammography systems Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 231 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. T. Schindera, R. C. Nelson, S. Mukundan Jr, E. K. Paulson, T. A. Jaffe, C. M. Miller, D. M. DeLong, K. Kawaji, T. T. Yoshizumi, and E. Samei Hypervascular Liver Tumors: Low Tube Voltage, High Tube Current Multi Detector Row CT for Enhanced Detection Phantom Study Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 125 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L J M Kroft, W J H Veldkamp, B J A Mertens, J-P A van Delft, and J Geleijns Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 984 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H Cole and C P Lawinski Developments in radiography and fluoroscopy Imaging, June 1, 2006; 18(2): 75 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|