Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 114(1-3):172-175; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch529
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziliukas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Morkunas, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziliukas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Morkunas, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Results of a patient dose survey on diagnostic radiology in Lithuania

J. Ziliukas and G. Morkunas*

Radiation Protection Centre, Kalvariju 153, LT-08221 Vilnius, Lithuania

* Corresponding author: genmo{at}takas.lt

One of the most effective means towards optimisation of radiation protection for patients undergoing radiodiagnostic examinations are the diagnostic reference levels. In order to ensure the effective use of these levels, they have to be set properly. National characteristics, such as the conditions of the radiological equipments, the training of the staff, the availability of quality assurance systems, etc., have to be taken into account when these levels are established. Measurements under real conditions were considered as the best tools to achieve these reference levels. With an aim to establish the Lithuanian national diagnostic reference levels, the nationwide survey of entrance surface doses received by the patients during the most typical X-ray examinations has been performed. The most common types of examinations, such as chest PA, skull PA and LAT, abdomen AP, lumbar spine AP and LAT, thorax spine AP and LAT, and hip joint AP, were included in the list of procedures under consideration. Hospitals of different size and levels using different X-ray machines were represented in the survey. The standard thermoluminescence dosemeter techniques with pellets attached to the skin of the patient in the centre of radiation field were applied. The data were analysed statistically, and the averages and 75th percentile were calculated. The results show that the Lithuanian diagnostic reference levels might be rather close to the ones promoted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Commission.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.