Measurement of radiation dose in dental radiology
1 Department of Radiology, County Hospital Ryhov, SE-551 85 Jönköping, Sweden
2 Department of Radiation Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences and University Hospital, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
* Corresponding author: ebba.helmrot{at}lj.se
Patient dose audit is an important tool for quality control and it is important to have a well-defined and easy to use method for dose measurements. In dental radiology, the most commonly used dose parameters for the setting of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are the entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) for intraoral examinations and dose width product (DWP) for panoramic examinations. DWP is the air kerma at the front side of the secondary collimator integrated over the collimator width and an exposure cycle. ESAK or DWP is usually measured in the absence of the patient but with the same settings of tube voltage (kV), tube current (mA) and exposure time as with the patient present. Neither of these methods is easy to use, and, in addition, DWP is not a risk related quantity. A better method of monitoring patient dose would be to use a dose area product (DAP) meter for all types of dental examinations. In this study, measurements with a DAP meter are reported for intraoral and panoramic examinations. The DWP is also measured with a pencil ionisation chamber and the product of DWP and the height H (DWP x H) of the secondary collimator (measured using film) was compared to DAP. The results show that it is feasible to measure DAP using a DAP meter for both intraoral and panoramic examinations. The DAP is therefore recommended for the setting of DRLs.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. K. Looe, F. Eenboom, N. Chofor, A. Pfaffenberger, M. Steinhoff, A. Ruhmann, A. Poplawski, K. Willborn, and B. Poppe Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2008; 131(3): 365 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Lofthag-Hansen, A Thilander-Klang, A Ekestubbe, E Helmrot, and K Grondahl Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 37(2): 72 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Poppe, H. K. Looe, A. Pfaffenberger, F. Eenboom, N. Chofor, M. Sering, A. Ruhmann, A. Poplawski, and K. Willborn Radiation exposure and dose evaluation in intraoral dental radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 1, 2007; 123(2): 262 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Poppe, H. K. Looe, A. Pfaffenberger, N. Chofor, F. Eenboom, M. Sering, A. Ruhmann, A. Poplawski, and K. Willborn Dose-area product measurements in panoramic dental radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 1, 2007; 123(1): 131 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. K. Looe, A. Pfaffenberger, N. Chofor, F. Eenboom, M. Sering, A. Ruhmann, A. Poplawski, K. Willborn, and B. Poppe Radiation exposure to children in intraoral dental radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2006; 121(4): 461 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|