Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on March 15, 2005
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 113(4):453-455; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch474
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Letter to the editor
Letter to the Editor
SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Sir,
Comments on Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.
In a recent publication, Brennan et al.(1) claim that increasing the film-focus distance (FFD) from 100 to 130 cm will reduce effective doses (E) by 33% for a pelvic X-ray examination. This conclusion is based on a reported 33% reduction in the entrance surface dose (ESD), by the use of the same effective dose per unit ESD conversion coefficient (E/ESD) at both FFD values. However, E/ESD values are only valid for the specific
UCD School of Diagnostic Imaging, Herbert Avenue Dublin 4, Ireland