Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004 110(1-4):687-692; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch149
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binns, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Harling, O. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binns, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Harling, O. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 110 Nos. 1-4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Dosimetric measurements with a brain equivalent plastic walled ionization chamber in an epithermal neutron beam

P. J. Binns1,*, K. J. Riley1 and O. K. Harling2

1 Nuclear Reactor Laboratory and 2 Nuclear Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 138 Albany Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

* Corresponding author: binns{at}mit.edu

The tissue substitute A-181 plastic, which has an elemental composition matching both the constituent hydrogen and nitrogen of brain tissue, was assessed for dosimetry in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). The sensitivity of an A-181 walled ionization chamber relative to photons for all neutrons in a clinical epithermal beam was calculated to vary between 0.79 ± 0.04 in-air and 0.95 ± 0.01 at depths of 4 cm and greater in-phantom. Differences in the total neutron doses measured with A-150 and A-181 plastic-walled chambers were attributed, within experimental error, to the dose produced by thermal neutron capture reactions from the different concentrations of nitrogen in the two tissue substitutes. The response of the A-181 chamber was converted to total neutron dose with an uncertainty increasing with depth in-phantom from 13 to 23% the magnitude of which is determined by the subtraction of a relatively large photon dose. The use of A-181 in place of A-150 plastic will no longer require partitioning the measured neutron dose by energy and should simplify dose reporting in BNCT.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.