Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004 109(4):331-348; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch310
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horowitz, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Olko, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horowitz, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Olko, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 109, No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Invited Paper

The effects of ionisation density on the thermoluminescence response (efficiency) of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P

Yigal Horowitz1,* and Pawel Olko2

1 Physics Department, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, Israel
2 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Radzikowskiego 152, PL 31-342, Krakow, Poland

* Corresponding author: yigal{at}bgumail.bgu.ac.il

In this paper, the various models dealing with the effects of ionisation density on the thermoluminescence (TL) response (efficiency) of TL LiF dosemeters are discussed. These include (i) the Unified Interaction Model (UNIM), which models photon/electron linear/supralinear dose response; (ii) the Extended Track Interaction Model (ETIM), which models heavy charged particle (HCP) TL fluence response; (iii) Modified Track Structure Theory (MTST), which models relative HCP TL efficiencies; and (iv) Microdosimetric Target Theory (MTT), which models both relative HCP efficiencies and photon energy response.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
Y. S. Horowitz
Letter to the Editor
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, August 8, 2007; (2007) ncm381v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
P. Olko, P. Bilski, N. A. El-Faramawy, H. Y. Goksu, J. L. Kim, R. Kopec, and M. P. R. Waligorski
On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2006; 119(1-4): 15 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
V. Chernov, T. M. Piters, and M. Barboza-Flores
Dose dependences of radiation induced yield in mixed radiation fields
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2006; 119(1-4): 80 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
I. Nail, Y. S. Horowitz, L. Oster, M. E. Brandan, M. Rodriguez-Villafuerte, A. E. Buenfil, C. Ruiz-Trejo, I. Gamboa-deBuen, O. Avila, V. M. Tovar, et al.
Search for ionisation density effects in the radiation absorption stage in LiF:Mg,Ti
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2006; 119(1-4): 180 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.