Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Tongeren, M.
Right arrow Articles by McKinney, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Tongeren, M.
Right arrow Articles by McKinney, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 108:227-236 (2004)
Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 108 No. 3 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Assessing occupational and domestic elf magnetic field exposure in the uk adult brain tumour study: results of a feasibility study

Martie van Tongeren1,2,*, Terry Mee3, Pamela Whatmough4, Lisa Broad2, Myron Maslanyj3, Stuart Allen3, Ken Muir4 and Patricia McKinney5,6

1 Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Humanities Building, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2 Institute of Occupational Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
3 National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB), Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK
4 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
5 Information and Statistics Division of the Common Services Agency, National Health Service Scotland, Trinity Park House, Edinburgh EH5 3SQ, Scotland
6 Unit of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

* Corresponding author: martie.van-tongeren{at}man.ac.uk

The feasibility of measuring exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF MF) in the UK Adult Brain Tumour Study (UKABTS) was examined. During the study, 81 individuals and 30 companies were approached with 79 individuals and 25 companies agreeing to participate. Exposure data were collected using EMDEX II dosemeters worn by the participants for 3–4 consecutive days. Data were collected over a total of 321 d, including non-occupational periods. The results showed occupational exposure to be the main determinant of overall exposure. Moderate to strong correlations were found between arithmetic mean exposure and all other metrics with the possible exception of maximum exposure. Significant differences in exposure were found between job categories with large variability in certain categories. Highest average exposures were found for security officers (arithmetic mean, AM: 0.78 µT), secretaries (AM: 0.48 µT) and dentists (AM: 0.42 µT). Welding and working near high-voltage power lines were associated with elevated exposure. In summary, acceptably precise measures of ELF MF exposure are feasible at relatively moderate cost. The results were used to develop a protocol for data collection from subjects in the UKABTS.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
T Mee, P Whatmough, L Broad, C Dunn, M Maslanyj, S Allen, K Muir, P A McKinney, and M van Tongeren
Occupational exposure of UK adults to extremely low frequency magnetic fields
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2009; 66(9): 619 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. W. Cherrie, M. Van Tongeren, and S. Semple
Exposure to Occupational Carcinogens in Great Britain
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2007; 51(8): 653 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.