Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on October 2, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 130(4):401-402; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn250
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
130/4/401    most recent
ncn250v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Time for More Dosimetry Comparisons?

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Dosimetry comparisons are carried out to evaluate the degree of consistency in the determination of quantities such as absorbed dose or dose equivalent by different laboratories. Comparison exercises are extremely useful when there is no national standard for the quantity in question. Examples are dose equivalent in high-energy neutron fields or the dose equivalent resulting from internally deposited radionuclides.

Dosimetry comparison exercises have been carried out for quite some time, and to help put things into context and possibly answer the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joseph C. McDonald, Editor-in-Chief


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?