Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on April 16, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 128(4):509-510; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn075
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Letters to the Editor
1 NRC – Negev Beer Sheva, Israel
2 Ben Gurion University Beer Sheva, Israel
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Sir,
Comments on The thermoluminescence dose-response and other characteristics of the high-temperature TL in LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) by Y. S. Horowitz, L. Oster and H. Datz
This recent article(1) was intended to be a review on the subject and it reflects the view of its authors, as already published in the past. When discussing the dose–response issue (by gas and contact heating) the works of two groups (us being one of them) are discussed at length and in much detail, somewhat outside the scope of a balanced review. The article contains claims that
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. German, M. Weinstein, A. Abraham, and Z. B. Alfassi Letter to the Editor Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 23, 2008; (2008) ncn176v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
