Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on May 26, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006 118(4):361-362; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/4/361    most recent
ncl063v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Editorial

To compare, or to intercompare?

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

There have been many papers published in our journal, and in others, dealing with methods for determining the degree of uniformity, or comparability, among radiation protection measurements. Usually, the technique employed is referred to as an intercomparison exercise. I confess to using this same description myself, despite the fact that my version of Microsoft Word always places a red squiggly line below the word, indicating that it is incorrectly spelled. The Microsoft spelling tool does not even provide an alternate spelling suggestion. A check of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joseph C. McDonald

Editor-in-Chief


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?