Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006 118(1):1-2; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Editorial

On Changes and Passings

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

As a person who has spent nearly all his career working in calibration laboratories, I think I can speak for others who work in similar areas when I say that change is something to be avoided. Changes in the calibration world are generally bad. Most of us spend our professional lifetimes trying to ensure that nothing changes. We would like calibration coefficients to be stable over periods of decades, even centuries if possible. Or, at least for as long . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joseph C. McDonald, Editor-in-Chief


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?