Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on May 30, 2009
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2009 135(3):211-215; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncp098
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
135/3/211    most recent
ncp098v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haridasan, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Puranik, V. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haridasan, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Puranik, V. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

An evaluation of radiation exposures in a tropical phosphogypsum disposal environment

P. P. Haridasan*, P. M. B. Pillai, R. M. Tripathi and V. D. Puranik

Environmental Assessment Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Health Physics Unit, IREL, Udyogamandal, Kerala 683 501, India

* Corresponding author: haripadmam{at}gmail.com, haridas67{at}rediffmail.com

Received March 4, 2009, amended April 25, 2009, accepted April 27, 2009

Environmental radiological aspects of phosphatic fertiliser production with particular reference to disposal of phosphogypsum at two sites in India are examined. Concentration of uranium and its decay products in the rock phosphate and products are presented. External gamma exposure and inhalation of radon and progeny are found to be the major routes of exposure to public in phosphogypsum disposal environment. An estimate of the committed effective dose to a representative person gives an average additional dose of 0.6 mSv annually in the study sites.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.