Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on August 30, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn226
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MULTICHANNEL DOSEMETER AND Al2O3:C OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE FIBRE SENSORS FOR USE IN RADIATION THERAPY: EVALUATION WITH ELECTRON BEAMS
1 CEA, LIST, Laboratoire de Mesures Optiques, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
2 CEA, LIST, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
3 Institut Gustave Roussy, Service de Physique, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, F-94805 Villejuif, France
4 CEA, LIST, Département des Technologies du Capteur et du Signal, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
* Corresponding author: sylvain.magne{at}cea.fr
Received May 1, 2008
This article proposes an innovative multichannel optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosemeter for on-line in vivo dose verification in radiation therapy. OSL fibre sensors incorporating small Al2O3:C fibre crystals (TLD500) have been tested with an X-ray generator. A reproducible readout procedure should reduce the fading-induced uncertainty (
– 1% per decade). OSL readouts are temperature-dependent [
0.3% K–1 when OSL stimulation is performed at the same temperature as irradiation;
0.16% K–1 after thermalisation (20°C)]. Sensor calibration and depth–dose measurements with electron beams have been performed with a Saturne 43 linear accelerator in reference conditions at CEA-LNHB (ionising radiation reference laboratory in France). Predosed OSL sensors show a good repeatability in multichannel operation and independence versus electron energy in the range (9, 18 MeV). The difference between absorbed doses measured by OSL and an ionisation chamber were within ± 0.9% (for a dose of about 1 Gy) despite a sublinear calibration curve.