Skip Navigation



Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on March 12, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/1-3/67    most recent
ncn005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mavrikou, I.
Right arrow Articles by Neofotistou, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mavrikou, I.
Right arrow Articles by Neofotistou, V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

HIGH PATIENT DOSES IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY DUE TO PHYSICIANS' NEGLIGENCE: HOW CAN THEY BE PREVENTED?

I. Mavrikou1,*, S. Kottou2, V. Tsapaki3 and V. Neofotistou1

1 Medical Physics Department, Athens General Hospital, 154 Mesogion Avenue, Athens, Greece
2 Medical Physics Department, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
3 Medical Physics Department, Konstantopoulio Agia Olga Hospital, Athens, Greece

* Corresponding author: imaur{at}otenet.gr

Interventional cardiology procedures are usually associated with high patient doses and even deterministic radiation effects may occur. Expensive digital flat panels are preferably used to lower doses, and Athens General Hospital has recently installed one. However, this study shows that it is the cardiologists' practice that lowers patients' doses. Doses delivered to patients during two time periods (pre and after radiation protection training) on a total of 1196 coronary angiographies and 506 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties were measured and analysed per cardiologist. Local reference levels (LRLs) were assessed and compared with the preliminary RLs provided by the European Research Program DIMOND. Results showed that although after the training patients' dose area product, fluoroscopy time, cumulative dose and number of images acquired were lowered, the situation remained unchanged for the cardiologist who delivered the highest doses. The question to answer next is how this bad practice can be prevented since no dose constraints apply to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures using ionising radiation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Mesbahi and N. Aslanabadi
A STUDY ON PATIENTS' RADIATION DOSES FROM INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC PROCEDURES IN TABRIZ, IRAN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 23, 2008; (2008) ncn310v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Mesbahi, N. Aslanabadi, and P. Mehnati
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF OPERATOR EXPERIENCE ON THE PATIENT RADIATION EXPOSURE IN CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 16, 2008; (2008) ncn300v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.