Skip Navigation



Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on November 10, 2007

Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm361
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
127/1-4/544    most recent
ncm361v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puncher, M.
Right arrow Articles by Birchall, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puncher, M.
Right arrow Articles by Birchall, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY ON INTERNAL DOSE ASSESSMENTS

M. Puncher* and A. Birchall

Radiation Protection Division, HPA Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK

* Corresponding author: matthew.puncher{at}hpa-rp.org.uk

The estimation of uncertainty on doses broadly falls into three categories. (1) Estimating the uncertainty on prospective doses. Here, the intake is known and the uncertainties in individual parameter values must be propagated through the calculated dose. (2) Estimating the error or uncertainty on dose assessments made from single measurements. Here, intake, model parameter and measurement uncertainties are propagated into the measurement, but default ICRP parameter values are used to estimate the intake and dose from the measurement. (3)Estimating the probability distribution of an individual's dose from a set of monitoring data. Here, Bayesian inference methods must be used to estimate the uncertainty on the estimated dose. A computer code is being developed that performs all three types of uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. The software samples biokinetic parameters from probability density functions and then calculates doses from these parameters by calling the dosimetry code IMBA Professional Plus. A description of the methodology, together with an example application of the software, is included in this paper.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Puncher and A. Birchall
A Monte Carlo method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties in internal dosimetry
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. W. Marsh, C. M. Castellani, C. Hurtgen, M. A. Lopez, A. Andrasi, M. R. Bailey, A. Birchall, E. Blanchardon, A. D. Desai, M.-D. Dorrian, et al.
INTERNAL DOSE ASSESSMENTS: UNCERTAINTY STUDIES AND UPDATE OF IDEAS GUIDELINES AND DATABASES WITHIN CONRAD PROJECT
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, October 6, 2008; (2008) ncn218v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
G. Miller
Variability and uncertainty of biokinetic model parameters: the discrete empirical Bayes approximation
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2008; 131(3): 394 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.