Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on June 26, 2007
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm221
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE STUDY OF ACTIVITY MEDIAN AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER USING IMAGING PLATE TECHNIQUE FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVE DOSE FROM RADON AND ITS DECAY PRODUCTS
1 Department of Energy Engineering and Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8603 Japan
2 Department of Urban and Environment Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, N13, W8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
3 Facility Radiation Control Section, Radiation Protection Department, Nuclear Science Research Institute, Tokai Research and Development Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
* Corresponding author: urmirahman244{at}yahoo.com, naureen{at}nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Received October 11, 2006, amended March 1, 2007, accepted March 5, 2007
The indoor workplace environment was evaluated for exposure to radon and its decay products at two Universities in two metropolises of Japan. The mean radon concentrations in Nagoya University (NU) and Hokkaido University (HU) were 16.7 Bq m3 and 18.0 Bq m3, respectively. Activity median aerodynamic diameter (AMAD) of particles at NU ranged from 172 nm
205 nm and at HU from 186 nm
300 nm. Estimated effective doses for five usual sites of NU by ICRP approach was 0.15 mSvy1
0.76 mSvy1 and by UNSCEAR approach was 0.05 mSvy1
0.24 mSvy1. The effective dose for the same of HU by ICRP 66 approach was 0.16 mSvy1
0.79 mSvy1 and by UNSCEAR 2000 approach was 0.05 mSv y1 to 0.26 mSv y1. The two approaches differs on an average by a factor 2.3
4.7. The AMAD of obtained particle size distribution at NU has an average total deposition of 23% in human respiratory tract and 20% at HU.