Skip Navigation



Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published online on September 5, 2007

Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm095
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
126/1-4/471    most recent
ncm095v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vanhavere, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vanhavere, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

ACHIEVEMENTS IN WORKPLACE NEUTRON DOSIMETRY IN THE LAST DECADE: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE EVIDOS PROJECT

R. J. Tanner1,*, T. Bolognese-Milsztajn2, M. Boschung3, M. Coeck4, G. Curzio5, F. d'Errico5, A. Fiechtner3, J-E. Lillhök6, V. Lacoste2, L. Lindborg6, M. Luszik-Bhadra7, M. Reginatto7, H. Schuhmacher7 and F. Vanhavere4

1 Radiation Protection Division, Health Protection Agency, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK
2 Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, F-92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
3 Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
4 Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie-Centre d'étude de l'énergie nucléaire, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
5 Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Nucleare e della Produzione, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
6 Swedish Radiation Protection Authority, SE-171 16 Stockholm, Sweden
7 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany

* Corresponding author: rick.tanner{at}hpa-rp.org.uk

The availability of active neutron personal dosemeters has made real time monitoring of neutron doses possible. This has obvious benefits, but is only of any real assistance if the dose assessments made are of sufficient accuracy and reliability. Preliminary assessments of the performance of active neutron dosemeters can be made in calibration facilities, but these can never replicate the conditions under which the dosemeter is used in the workplace. Consequently, it is necessary to assess their performance in the workplace, which requires the field in the workplace to be fully characterised in terms of the energy and direction dependence of the fluence. This paper presents an overview of developments in workplace neutron dosimetry but concentrates on the outcomes of the EVIDOS project, which has made significant advances in the characterisation of workplace fields and the analysis of dosemeter responses in those fields.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. C. McDonald
Time for More Dosimetry Comparisons?
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, October 2, 2008; (2008) ncn250v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.