| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 83:165-169 (1999)
© 1999 Oxford University Press
Exposure Metrics for RF Epidemiology: Cellular Phone Handsets
The parameters are described that characterise the exposure of the users of cellular phones. The parameters are distinguished in two classes: the human and the cell phone parameters. Among the human parameters the following are discussed: size and shape of head and neck, manner of holding the phone (left vs. right, finger tips vs. palm contact) and phone position on the face of the user. The cell phone parameters causing the largest exposure variations are: antenna geometry (size, shape, extended or retracted) and matching conditions; operating RF power level; proximity of tissue to RF currents on metal parts, channel access method (analogue, pulsed, CDMA). The large variability of the RF exposure is further expanded by the variety (ever increasing) of phone models available to users who may change service frequently or sporadically. After a brief discussion of possible dose definitions and the uncertainty of the 'user' of a cell phone for a specific call, the paper analyses the critical exposure parameters that should be investigated to characterise statistically the RF exposure of the subjects of an epidemiological study. The improved exposure assessment of the users of cellular phones requires the cooperation of network operators and equipment manufacturers. The statistics of the most critical parameters, those with variability greater than 10:1, can be collected by modifying the software and hardware of the cell phone equipment. The paper suggests base station software modifications and the introduction of cell phone 'dosemeter' devices that record some of the critical exposure parameters. A certain number of these 'dosemeters' should be distributed among subscribers to determine the statistical variations of the RF exposure from cell phones. The paper concludes by recommending a pilot dosimetric study independent from any epidemiological study.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Vrijheid, S Mann, P Vecchia, J Wiart, M Taki, L Ardoino, B K Armstrong, A Auvinen, D Bedard, G Berg-Beckhoff, et al. Determinants of mobile phone output power in a multinational study: implications for exposure assessment Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2009; 66(10): 664 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Johansen, J. D. Boice Jr., J. K. McLaughlin, and J. H. Olsen Cellular Telephones and Cancer--a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark J Natl Cancer Inst, February 7, 2001; 93(3): 203 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

