Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klemic, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shebell, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klemic, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shebell, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 58:133-142 (1995)
© 1995 Oxford University Press

Results of the Tenth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosemeters

G. Klemic, J. Shobe, T. Gesell and P. Shebell

The tenth in a series of international intercomparisons of environmental dosemeters was held at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory from December 1992 to April 1993. One hundred and two participants from 27 countries submitted 158 dosemeter sets for exposure to natural environmental radiation and a laboratory 137Cs source. The field conditions were unusually harsh, with temperatures ranging from -32.8 to +12.8 oC, snow accumulating up to 76 cm, and winds reaching speeds of nearly 22 m.s-1. The field dose rate was measured independently by pressurised ionisation chambers, and the laboratory exposures were verified by National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated transfer chambers. Overall, the performance of most dosemeters was quite good, with 90-97% of the participants reporting within 30% of the delivered dose for the field and laboratory exposures. For similar dose levels, performance was about the same for both field and laboratory exposures. Calculations of the overall bias and standard deviation for each dosemeter set indicated that 93% of them would pass a performance criterion (tolerance level of 0.5) which is presently under consideration for the new ANSI standard on environmental dosimetry testing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.