| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 56:21-27 (1994)
© 1994 Oxford University Press
Analysis of Radon Mitigation Techniques Used in Existing US Houses
This paper reviews the full range of techniques that have been installed in existing US houses for the purpose of reducing indoor radon concentrations resulting from soil gas entry. The review addresses the performance, installation and operating costs, applicability, mechanisms, advantages, and disadvantages of each radon mitigation technique. Active soil depressurisation (ASD) techniques are the measures most widely used by mitigation contractors. ASD techniques consistently and reliably provide the highest radon reductions, at costs often competitive with the less effective alternatives. The large majority of existing US houses having elevated radon can be effectively treated using ASD. Various other techniques can be used in houses where ASD is difficult or impractical to apply, or where lesser radon reductions are acceptable. However, these other techniques are always less effective, less reliable, or less well demonstrated than ADS.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Rahman and B. L. Tracy Radon control systems in existing and new construction: a review Radiat Prot Dosimetry, August 1, 2009; 135(4): 243 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T Bogen and D. W Layton Risk management for plausibly hormetic environmental carcinogens: The case of radon Human and Experimental Toxicology, August 1, 1998; 17(8): 463 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

