Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapple, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlings, D.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chapple, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlings, D.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 54:299-302 (1994)
© 1994 Oxford University Press

The Implications of ICRP 60 on the Monitoring of Pregnant Hospital Staff

C.-L. Chapple, K. Faulkner, N.W. Marshall and D.J. Rawlings

The recent recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) introduced a supplementary dose limit for the surface of the abdomen of pregnant staff, to restrict the radiation dose to the foetus. This has wide ranging implications on the monitoring of staff in hospitals, some of which are studied here. The relationship between foetal dose, entrance surface dose to the abdomen and personal monitor reading was determined using a anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescence dosemeters to record the dose to the uterus, as well as on the surface of the abdomen. Film badges were attached to the phantom at various anatomical positions. This phantom was irradiated for simulations of fluoroscopic examinations in diagnostic radiology and various brachytherapy treatments. The relationships between monitor reading and foetal dose have been derived, and a number of practical monitoring problems for pregnant staff discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.