Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leuthold, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schraube, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leuthold, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schraube, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 54:217-220 (1994)
© 1994 Oxford University Press

Critical Analysis of the ICRP 60 Proposals for Neutron Radiation and a Possible Solution

G. Leuthold and H. Schraube

The application of the radiation weighting factor WR and the new concept of effective dose to determine a radiation risk relevant body dose, results in large differences in comparison with the old concept of effective dose equivalent of ICRP 26. Modifications of the radiation weighting factor are proposed, which will not change the general concept of ICRP 60, but will lead to a reduction of these differences. The methods are discussed and the resulting fluence-to-effective dose conversion function is calculated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. H. Olsher, T. D. McLean, A. L. Justus, R. T. Devine, and M. S. Gadd
PERSONAL DOSE EQUIVALENT CONVERSION COEFFICIENTS FOR NEUTRON FLUENCE OVER THE ENERGY RANGE OF 20-250 MEV
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, November 3, 2009; (2009) ncp250v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.