Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sensintaffar, E.L.
Right arrow Articles by Windham, S.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sensintaffar, E.L.
Right arrow Articles by Windham, S.T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 45:33-36 (1992)
© 1992 Oxford University Press

Analysis of Error and Minimum Detection Limits for 222Rn Measurements

E.L. Sensintaffar, D.A. Chambless, D.J. Gray and S.T. Windham

Charcoal canisters have come into widespread use for screening measurements of 222Rn, especially in residences, and public and commercial buildings. Although measurements made by the canister method are not of laboratory-grade accuracy, the method is none the less very attractive for a number of uses such as those cited above. For this reason, it is quite important to make a realistic assessment of the error inherent in this methodology and its associated detection limits. This paper reports on recent efforts made at the National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory (NAREL) in this regard. An important finding in this work is that both the total error and the minimum detectable level rapidly reach unacceptable levels when the diffusion barrier charcoal canister is exposed for less than 2 d. In fact, the results of the theoretical investigations reported herein indicate that the 7 d exposure period advocated by the NAREL is nearly optimum.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.