Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tilikidis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lindborg, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tilikidis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lindborg, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 28:53-57 (1989)
© 1989 Oxford University Press

Techniques for Evaluating Conversion Coefficients to the New Dose Equivalent Quantities at a Calibration Laboratory

A. Tilikidis, J.E. Grindborg and L. Lindborg

The Swedish authority for radiation protection, SSI, recommends the use of ambient and directional dose equivalents for environmental monitoring. To be able to offer calibration services, conversion coefficients for the low rate X ray radiation qualities recommended by the ISO in its report 4037 have been evaluated in a few different ways. The radiation qualities were determined both in terms of half value layers (HVL) and photon fluence distributions and conversion coefficients from air kerma to the new dose equivalents were calculated. The HVL measurements confirmed observations reported by others that the HVL values in practice deviate from those in the ISO report. The spectral distributions were measured with a HPGe semiconductor detector and the spectra were corrected to show the actual spectral distribution in air. The ambient and directional dose equivalents were then calculated using conversion factors from ICRP and analytical functions from Wagner et al. The two sets of data gave results that agreed within 2%. For calibrating laboratories a fluence distribution measurement technique may not always be available or practicable to use. Conversion factors calculated from effective and mean photon energy of the X ray beams were therefore compared with those derived above and agreed within 4% with those obtained when the whole photon fluence distributions were considered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.