Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on July 21, 2009
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2009 135(4):243-255; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncp112
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radon control systems in existing and new construction: a review
Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Al 6302D, Ottawa, ON, Canada
* Corresponding author: naureen_rahman{at}hc-sc.gc.ca, urmirahman244{at}yahoo.com
Received February 5, 2009, amended May 26, 2009, accepted June 1, 2009
In support of the implementation of the new Canadian radon guideline, a comprehensive review of radon mitigation techniques used in countries around the world was undertaken, with particular emphasis on North America and Europe that have climates and construction techniques similar to Canada. The results of this review are presented here as an aid to administrators of radon control programmes, companies offering radon testing and mitigation services and other concerned parties, both in Canada and elsewhere, who are facing issues of implementing a radon control strategy. A wide variety of radon mitigation strategies have been employed worldwide and all have achieved some success in reducing radon concentrations. Generally, active mitigation techniques involving physical alterations to a house (e.g. sub-slab depressurisation) are more effective in achieving a sustained and substantial radon reduction than passive techniques (e.g. improved ventilation or sealing of cracks). To a large extent, the choice of an optimal mitigation strategy will depend on the building type, soil conditions and climate. Radon levels should be measured at periodic intervals after remediation, perhaps once every 5 y, to ensure that concentrations continue to remain at acceptable levels.