Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on April 26, 2009
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2009 134(3-4):143-151; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncp068
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
134/3-4/143    most recent
ncp068v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Healey, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Healey, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Lead toxicity, vulnerable subpopulations and emergency preparedness

Norm Healey*

Azimuth Consulting Group Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada

* Corresponding author: nhealey{at}azimuthgroup.ca

This paper reviews some evidence of the toxic effects of lead (Pb) in the context of vulnerable subpopulations and emergency preparedness. Pb is ubiquitous in the environment and is used in many building materials. Environmental Pb concentrations and body burdens of Pb have been shown to increase following disasters. Pb is a systemic toxicant with no known beneficial biological function and, for several endpoints, no identified threshold of toxicity. The fetus, children, pregnant and elderly are particularly susceptible to some of the toxic effects of Pb. Pb exposures in infancy have been shown in vivo to produce an equal degree of neurobehavioural impairment as exposures of much longer duration at equivalent doses during adolescence. Evidence from animal bioassays indicates that the carcinogenic potency of perinatal Pb exposure may be about 3-fold higher than adult lifetime exposure at an equivalent dose. Animal assays show up to a 12-fold difference between fetal, neonatal and adult life stages in sensitivity to the immunological effects of Pb. Pb exposure is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality—health endpoints for which the elderly are at increased risk. Finally, endogenous and exogenous variables, such as psychological and physiological stress, dietary deficiencies and concomitant exposure to other chemical, biological and radiological hazards, can also potentially modify or potentiate the toxic effects of Pb. Because of the potential for concurrent influence of these modifying variables in a post-disaster environment, emergency response planners are encouraged to consider disaster victims and responders, as a whole, as a potentially vulnerable subpopulation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.