Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on May 8, 2009
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2009 134(2):122-129; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncp079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
134/2/122    most recent
ncp079v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ågren, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ågren, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Uncertainty in HPGe detector calibrations for in situ gamma-ray spectrometry

Jonas Boson1,2,*, Lennart Johansson2, Henrik Ramebäck1 and Göran Ågren1

1 Swedish Defence Research Agency, FOI CBRN Defence and Security, SE-901 82 Umeå, Sweden
2 Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden

* Corresponding author: jonas.boson{at}foi.se

Received August 26, 2008, amended April 7, 2009, accepted April 13, 2009

Semi-empirical methods are often used for efficiency calibrations of in situ gamma-ray spectrometry measurements with high-purity germanium detectors. The intrinsic detector efficiency is experimentally determined for different photon energies and angles of incidence, and a suitable expression for the efficiency is fitted to empirical data. In this work, the combined standard uncertainty of such an efficiency function for two detectors was assessed. The uncertainties in individual efficiency measurements were found to be about 1.9 and 3.1% (with a coverage factor k = 1, i.e. with a confidence interval of about 68%) for the two detectors. The main contributions to these uncertainties were found to originate from uncertainties in source-to-detector distance, source activity and full-energy peak count rate. The standard uncertainties of the fitted functions were found to be somewhat higher than the uncertainty of individual data points, i.e. 5.2 and 8.1% (k = 1). With the introduction of a new expression for the detector efficiency, these uncertainties were reduced to 3.7 and 4.2%, i.e. with up to a factor of two. Note that this work only addresses the uncertainty in the determination of intrinsic detector efficiency.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.