Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on December 2, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 132(2):220-227; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn292
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/2/220    most recent
ncn292v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Infante-Rivard, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Infante-Rivard, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Chemical risk factors and childhood leukaemia: a review of recent studies{dagger}

Claire Infante-Rivard*

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 1110 Pine Avenue West, Montréal, Province of Québec, Canada H3A 1A3

* Corresponding author: claire.infante-rivard{at}mcgill.ca

The search for chemical risks factors as determinants of childhood leukaemia has been ongoing for over two decades. Results of epidemiological studies, published from 1998 to the present, evaluating parental smoking, outdoor sources of pollution, indoor contaminants and chemicals from drinking water are reported. Overall, results were mostly negative. This may be due to the relatively small study sizes to detect environmental effects, usually measured imprecisely. Another reason may be that such effects, which may be revealed among the genetically susceptible, have rarely accounted for genetic susceptibility. The few studies that have are also reported here. Suggestions are made for work in the immediate future, which include pooling of data and of analyses, as well as carrying out in-depth reviews of studies with the goal of understanding the reasons for discrepant results.


{dagger} Prepared while at: UMR-S 754 INSERM, France. Paper presented at the ICNIRP/WHO/BfS Workshop, 5–7 May 2008, Berlin, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.